Firms have long relied on diversity training to reduce bias on the job, hiring tests and performance ratings to limit it in recruitment and promotions, and grievance systems to give employees a way to challenge managers. Yet laboratory studies show that this kind of force-feeding can activate bias rather than stamp it out. As social scientists have found, people often rebel against rules to assert their autonomy. Yet this approach also flies in the face of nearly everything we know about how to motivate people to make changes.
Do people who undergo training usually shed their biases? Researchers have been examining that question since before World War II, in nearly a thousand studies.
- The Last Sunrise: A Novella.
- Shop now and earn 2 points per $1.
- Intentions of The Pleiadians by Sunny T thru Murdock.
- La fine del mondo (Italian Edition).
- The Stolen Years.
- See a Problem?.
It turns out that while people are easily taught to respond correctly to a questionnaire about bias, they soon forget the right answers. The positive effects of diversity training rarely last beyond a day or two, and a number of studies suggest that it can activate bias or spark a backlash.
Nonetheless, nearly half of midsize companies use it, as do nearly all the Fortune Many firms see adverse effects. One reason is that three-quarters use negative messages in their training. Another reason is that about three-quarters of firms with training still follow the dated advice of the late diversity guru R. Roosevelt Thomas Jr. Trainers tell us that people often respond to compulsory courses with anger and resistance —and many participants actually report more animosity toward other groups afterward. Research from the University of Toronto reinforces our findings: In one study white subjects read a brochure critiquing prejudice toward blacks.
When people felt pressure to agree with it, the reading strengthened their bias against blacks. When they felt the choice was theirs, the reading reduced bias. Companies too often signal that training is remedial. The diversity manager at a national beverage company told us that the top brass uses it to deal with problem groups.
Managers tend to resent that implication and resist the message. This kind of thing still happens.
When we interviewed the new HR director at a West Coast food company, he said he found that white managers were making only strangers—most of them minorities—take supervisor tests and hiring white friends without testing them. But even managers who test everyone applying for a position may ignore the results. Investment banks and consulting firms build tests into their job interviews, asking people to solve math and scenario-based problems on the spot.
While studying this practice, Kellogg professor Lauren Rivera played a fly on the wall during hiring meetings at one firm. She found that the team paid little attention when white men blew the math test but close attention when women and blacks did. Because decision makers deliberately or not cherry-picked results, the testing amplified bias rather than quashed it. Managers made only strangers—most of them minorities—take tests and hired white friends without testing them. There are significant declines among white and Asian-American women—groups with high levels of education, which typically score well on standard managerial tests.
Companies sued for discrimination often claim that their performance rating systems prevent biased treatment. But studies show that raters tend to lowball women and minorities in performance reviews. And some managers give everyone high marks to avoid hassles with employees or to keep their options open when handing out promotions.
This last tactic is meant to identify and rehabilitate biased managers. About half of midsize and large firms have systems through which employees can challenge pay, promotion, and termination decisions.
But many managers—rather than change their own behavior or address discrimination by others—try to get even with or belittle employees who complain. We see this a lot in our interviews. Still, most employers feel they need some sort of system to intercept complaints, if only because judges like them. They apply three basic principles: engage managers in solving the problem, expose them to people from different groups, and encourage social accountability for change.
So, if you prompt them to act in ways that support a particular view, their opinions shift toward that view. When managers actively help boost diversity in their companies, something similar happens: They begin to think of themselves as diversity champions. Take college recruitment programs targeting women and minorities. Our interviews suggest that managers willingly participate when invited. Managers who make college visits say they take their charge seriously. They are determined to come back with strong candidates from underrepresented groups—female engineers, for instance, or African-American management trainees.
Cognitive dissonance soon kicks in—and managers who were wishy-washy about diversity become converts. The effects are striking. Mentoring is another way to engage managers and chip away at their biases. While white men tend to find mentors on their own, women and minorities more often need help from formal programs.
Good mentors do not take their roles lightly. They feel invested in the success of the mentee. Usually, this requires someone who is knowledgeable, compassionate, and possesses the attributes of a good teacher or trainer. Excellent communication skills also are required.
A good mentor is committed to helping their mentees find success and gratification in their chosen professions. Overall good mentoring requires empowering the mentee to develop their own strengths, beliefs, and personal attributes.
8 Qualities of a Good Mentor
A good mentor exhibits the personal attributes it takes to be successful in the field. By showing the mentee what it takes to be productive and successful, they are demonstrating the specific behaviors and actions required to succeed in the field. Remember, the positive attitude must go both ways. If you are lucky enough to find a mentor, hold on tight, and take the relationship seriously.
A good mentoring relationship provides new employees as well as interns with someone who will share their professional knowledge and expertise in the field. A good mentor is available to answer any questions relevant to the job. Following suggestions and recommendations as well as reading all pertinent literature available in the field is a good way to show your mentor that you are committed to being successful and that you take your career and responsibilities seriously.
Ask them about their experiences and learn from their stories. How to Poo at Work How to Getting Past No. The Supervisor's Survival Guide. The New Executive Assistant Exceptional executive office management. Working With Monsters. Item Added: The Hands-off Manager. View Wishlist. Our Awards Booktopia's Charities.
Are you sure you would like to remove these items from your wishlist? Remove From Wishlist Cancel.